Friday, May 21, 2010

Columbine killers are heroes?

I have been doing a lot of research on Columbine and find out that people are saying the 13 got killed


deserved it.Those that got killed were 2-3 years younger than the killers and hardly knew them.


Where is the justice saying they deserved it?


I have watched youtube videos and people


all around the world think it is great that Eric and Dylan shot up the school.


These kids who are making them out to be heroes,


I wonder if these kids are being bullied at school?


I do not make them out to be heroes,if they were


being bullied why did they not say something to


someone instead of their anger pushing them


to the point of no return.


I too was bullied and hod almost no friends myself.


after my research I vagley understand why they did


it.What would the parents of their children who were


murdered say about people making them out to be


heroes?

Columbine killers are heroes?
I have never seen or heard anyone calling them "heroes".





They absolutely were not heroes, they took a long time planning this murderous attack and there are indications that their parents knew something was not right, but they were just hoping their sons were going through and "angry teen" phase. These two knew they were not going to walk out of this alive, because they committed suicide. It was planned and carried out with no humanity.
Reply:You really shouldn't have to ask this question, but I'll answer. The columbine murderers were the slime of humanity. They aren't worthy to lick the scum on the bottom of my shoe








are you really one to judge? Report It

Reply:The bullying that Eric and Dylan has suffered was pretty severe. Athletes in particular, due to their esteemed position, got away with bullying. This lead to the pair targeting athletes as well as others. Their isolation and depression was evident. One of the them wrote a poem about being a bullet penatrating into a victim. Their plight was overlooked by peers and authorities. They were obviously disturbed and needed serious help.





However, the shooters at Columbine are not hereos. They did not cope with the problem in a positive way such as talking about it to other people. They did not show respect for others any more than other people showed to them. They were racists who deliberately shot Blacks and Hispanics even if they were innocent of bullying. Those who admitted being religious were killed as well. Just because they suffered, but the lives they took was no justification for their actions.





If there is positive aspect to this, the lessons to be learn include but not limited to...


1) Bullying is not something to be taken lightly, it can have lasting damage to both victims and perpetrators. I do not condone the shootings, especially when innocents are involved, but perpertual abuse of others can drive those over the edge. Feel bullied victims go that far, but many do fall into deep depression. Bullies will have a hard time coping as an adult as standards of behavior change.


2) Mental illness is disease. They need help before they become a threat to themselves and others. The cause can be biological (like chemical inbalance in the brain) and medication may be necessary. Perhaps things could have been much better if the two changed their way of thinking (which was self-destructive) and had better coping strategies and outlets to aggression.
Reply:i hate the fact that people are bullied everyday but i don't think they should kill anyone. i don't think if a person kills someone they are any better than the person that bullied them. i think that if you are bullied you should tell a teacher or parent. i think they would rather take you out of the situation before you get to the point where you could kill someone. murderers are not heroes.
Reply:I think this problem is getting out of hand. All over the world children seem to be able to get guns too easily. I know that some children do relate to child-shooters and think of them as heroes. I think it is partially the responsibility of the parents to explain to their children that this kind of behaviour is not to be tolerated at all. On the other hand I also think it's partially the responsibility of the media that they will not expose such young children to these messages the way they do at the moment. Children do get too accustomed to this kind of news and it's becoming less terrifying each time they hear or see it.





I think your question is a little misplaced because I think that not a single person who has got some respect for the unfortunate children in high school shootings will agree with the statement that these shooters are heroes. I think it hurts everyone when you realise that society is so messed up that these thoughts can come across it by such young children.
Reply:You really shouldn't have to ask this question, but I'll answer. The columbine murderers were the slime of humanity. They aren't worthy to lick the scum on the bottom of my shoe.
Reply:Sorry I cannto say anything I am not aware about these Columbine.
Reply:Obviously shooting schoolkids is not an advisable tactic, but the issue did bring to light the brutal culture of violence and alienation in many middle-American highschools. Saying that you can understand what makes someone go postal is not the same thing as saying that they are heroes or that the victims deserve what they got.





The Columbine High School shooting was an all-round tragedy that could have been avoided. If any good can come out of it. it's in trying to end the culture of harrassment in schools, but so far I don't think much progress has been made in this directuion. It's so much easier just to demonise the perpetrators.
Reply:no offense but only immature and ignorant people think like this?





if that's the case then everybody's dead in this earth just because we let our emotion get over us.
Reply:All you have to do is place the actions against yourself. Would you like someone to shoot you? Of course not. The people that are saying that the trench coat posse boys are heros could be just as dysfunctional as the killers themselves. A hero saves lives, protects others, and stands up for a rightous deed. Did they save lives? No. Did they protect others? No they were the threat. They acted on a unrightous deed because they took that law into their own hands and performed cruel acts against innocent people. The people that are promoting the killers have no proof that the people killed were bad, it is just thieir opinion.
Reply:they were disturbed young men, but consider why they were disturbed... no one likes to feel humiliated or made fun off. But that does not give anyone the right to take a life... they were cowards!!!


It sounds cliche, but can't we all just get along?
Reply:rule #1 killing is wrong.


rule #2 refer to rule 1





rule # 3 if you have ignored the first two rules always remember the most important rule: killing is WRONG! DUH!

height increasing shoes

No comments:

Post a Comment